INTRODUCTION:
DEFINITION: Gene therapy is the insertion, alteration, or removal of genes within an
individual's cells and biological
tissues to treat disease.
It is a technique for correcting defective genes that are responsible for
disease development. The most common form of gene therapy involves the
insertion of functional genes into an unspecified genomic location in order to
replace a mutated
gene, but other forms involve directly correcting the mutation or modifying
normal gene that enables a viral infection.
Types of gene therapy:
1.
Germ line gene therapy
In the case of germ line gene therapy, germ cells, i.e., sperm or eggs
are modified by the introduction of functional genes, which are integrated into
their genomes. Therefore, the change due to therapy would be heritable and
would be passed on to later generations. This new approach, theoretically,
should be highly effective in counteracting genetic disorders and hereditary
diseases. However, many jurisdictions prohibit this for application in human
beings, at least for the present, for a variety of technical and ethical reasons.
2.
Somatic gene therapy
In the case of somatic gene therapy, the therapeutic genes are
transferred into the somatic cells of a patient. Any modifications and
effects will be restricted to the individual patient only, and will not be
inherited by the patient's offspring or later generations.
Approach:
Scientists have taken the logical
step of trying to introduce genes directly into human cells, focusing on
diseases caused by single-gene defects, such as cystic fibrosis, haemophilia, muscular dystrophy
and sickle cell anemia. However, this has proven
more difficult than modifying bacteria, primarily because of the problems
involved in carrying large sections of DNA and delivering them to the correct
site on the gene. Today, most gene therapy studies are aimed at cancer and
hereditary diseases linked to a genetic defect. Antisense therapy is
not strictly a form of gene therapy, but is a related, genetically-mediated
therapy.The most common form of genetic engineering involves the insertion of a functional gene at an unspecified location in the host genome. This is accomplished by isolating and copying the gene of interest, generating a construct containing all the genetic elements for correct expression, and then inserting this construct into a random location in the host organism. Other forms of genetic engineering include gene targeting and knocking out specific genes via engineered nucleases such as zinc finger nucleases, engineered I-CreI homing endonucleases, or nucleases generated from TAL effectors. An example of gene-knockout mediated gene therapy is the knockout of the human CCR5 gene in T-cells in order to control HIV infection. This approach is currently being used in several human clinical trials.
The biology of human gene therapy remains complex and many techniques need further development. Many diseases and their strict genetic link need to be understood more fully before gene therapy can be used appropriately. The public policy debate surrounding the possible use of genetically engineered material in human subjects has been equally complex. Major participants in the debate have come from the fields of biology, government, law, medicine, philosophy, politics, and religion, each bringing different views to the discussion.
Procedure:
Gene
therapy is designed to introduce genetic material into cells to compensate for
abnormal genes or to make a beneficial protein. If a mutated gene causes a necessary
protein to be faulty or missing, gene therapy may be able to introduce a normal
copy of the gene to restore the function of the protein. A gene that is
inserted directly into a cell usually does not function. Instead, a carrier called
a vector is genetically engineered to deliver the gene. Certain viruses are often
used as vectors because they can deliver the new gene by infecting the cell. The
viruses are modified so they can’t cause disease when used in people. Some types
of virus, such as retroviruses, integrate their genetic material (including the
new gene) into a chromosome in the human cell. Other viruses, such as
Adenoviruses,
introduce their DNA into the nucleus of the cell, but the DNA is not integrated
into a chromosome. The vector can be injected or given intravenously (by IV)
directly into a specific tissue in the body, where it is taken up by individual
cells. Alternately, a sample of the patient’s cells can be removed and exposed
to the vector in a laboratory setting. The cells containing the vector are then
returned to the patient. If the treatment is successful, the new gene delivered
by the vector will make a functioning protein. Researchers must overcome many
technical challenges before gene therapy will be a practical approach to
treating disease. For example, scientists must find better ways to deliver
genes and target them to particular cells. They must also ensure that new genes
are precisely controlled by the body.
Conventional
Vectors in gene therapy
Viruses
Ø Viral vector:
All viruses bind to their
hosts and introduce their genetic material into the host cell as part of their
replication cycle. There are two main types of virus infection: lytic and
lysogenic. Shortly after inserting its DNA, viruses of the lytic cycle quickly
produce more viruses, burst from the cell and infect more cells. Lysogenic
viruses integrate their DNA into the DNA of the host cell and may live in the
body for many years before responding to a trigger
Ø Retroviruses:
The genetic material in retroviruses
is in the form of RNA molecules,
while the genetic material of their hosts is in the form of DNA. When a
retrovirus infects a host cell, it will introduce its RNA together with some
enzymes, namely reverse transcriptase and integrase, into the cell. This RNA
molecule from the retrovirus must produce a DNA copy from its RNA molecule
before it can be integrated into the genetic material of the host cell. The
process of producing a DNA copy from an RNA molecule is termed reverse transcription. It is carried out by
one of the enzymes carried in the virus, called reverse transcriptase.
After this DNA copy is produced and is free in the nucleus
of the host cell, it must be incorporated into the genome of the host cell.
That is, it must be inserted into the large DNA molecules in the cell (the
chromosomes). This process is done by another enzyme carried in the virus
called integrase.
Ø Replication-Competent Vectors:
A
replication-competent vector called ONYX-015 is used in replicating tumor
cells. It was found that in the absence of the E1B-55Kd viral protein,
adenovirus caused very rapid apoptosis of infected, p53(+) cells, and this
results in dramatically reduced virus progeny and no subsequent spread.
Apoptosis was mainly the result of the ability of EIA to inactivate p300. In
p53(-) cells, deletion of E1B 55kd has no consequence in terms of apoptosis,
and viral replication is similar to that of wild-type virus, resulting in
massive killing of cells.
Ø Herpes Simplex Virus:
The Herpes simplex virus
is a human neurotropic virus. This is mostly examined for gene transfer in the
nervous system. The wild type HSV-1 virus is able to infect neurons. Infected neurons
are not rejected by the immune system. Though the latent virus is not
transcriptionally apparent, it does possess neuron specific promoters that can
continue to function normally. Antibodies to HSV-1 are common in humans;
however complications due to herpes infection are somewhat rare.
Non-viral methods:
Non-viral methods
present certain advantages over viral methods, with simple large scale
production and low host immunogenicity being just two. Previously, low levels
of transfection and expression
of the gene held non-viral methods at a disadvantage; however, recent
advances in vector technology have yielded molecules and techniques with
transfection efficiencies similar to those of viruses.
Injection of Naked DNA:
This is the simplest
method of non-viral transfection. Clinical trials carried out of intramuscular
injection of a naked DNA
plasmid have occurred with some success; however, the expression has been very
low in comparison to other methods of transfection. In addition to trials with
plasmids, there have been trials with naked PCR product, which have had similar or
greater success. Cellular uptake of naked DNA is generally inefficient.
Research efforts focusing on improving the efficiency of naked DNA uptake have
yielded several novel methods, such as electroporation, sonoporation, and the use
of a "gene
gun", which shoots DNA coated gold particles into the cell using high
pressure gas.
Physical Methods to Enhance Delivery
·
Electroporation
Electroporation is a
method that uses short pulses of high voltage to carry DNA across the cell
membrane. This shock is thought to cause temporary formation of pores in the
cell membrane, allowing DNA molecules to pass through. Electroporation is
generally efficient and works across a broad range of cell types. However, a
high rate of cell death following electroporation has limited its use,
including clinical applications.
·
Gene Gun
The use of particle
bombardment, or the gene gun,
is another physical method of DNA transfection. In this technique, DNA is
coated with gold particles and loaded into a device which generates a force to
achieve penetration of DNA/gold into the cells.
Chemical Methods to Enhance Delivery
Oligonucleotides:
The use of
synthetic oligonucleotides in gene therapy is to inactivate the genes involved
in the disease process. There are several methods by which this is achieved.
One strategy uses antisense specific to the target gene to disrupt the
transcription of the faulty gene. Another uses small molecules of RNA called siRNA to signal the
cell to cleave specific unique sequences in the mRNA transcript of the
faulty gene, disrupting translation of the faulty mRNA, and therefore
expression of the gene. A further strategy uses double stranded
oligodeoxynucleotides as a decoy for the transcription factors that are
required to activate the transcription of the target gene. The transcription
factors bind to the decoys instead of the promoter of the faulty gene, which
reduces the transcription of the target gene, lowering expression.
Additionally, single stranded DNA oligonucleotides have been used to direct a
single base change within a mutant gene. The oligonucleotide is designed to
anneal with complementarity to the target gene with the exception of a central
base, the target base, which serves as the template base for repair. This
technique is referred to as oligonucleotide mediated gene repair, targeted gene
repair, or targeted nucleotide alteration.
Read About Recent advance in Gene Therapy
REFERENCES:
- Akira, S., Uematsu, S., and Takeuchi, O. (2006).
Pathogen recognition and innate immunity. Cell 124, 783-801.
- Appledorn, D.M., McBride, A., Seregin, S., Scott,
J.M., Schuldt, N., Kiang, A., Godbehere, S., and Amalfitano,
- (2008). Complex interactions with several arms
of the complement system dictate innate and humoral immunity to
adenoviral vectors. Gene Ther 15, 1606-1617.
- Bobadilla, J.
L., Macek, M., Fine, J. P. and Farrell, P. M. (2002) Cystic fibrosis: a
worldwide analysis of CFTR mutations – correlation with incidence data and
application to screening. Hum. Mutat. 19, 575–606
- M. L. Brandi, R. F. Gagel, A. Angeli et al.,
“Consensus: guidelines for diagnosis and therapy of MEN type 1 and type
2,”
Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism,
vol. 86, no.12, pp. 5658–5671, 2001
- ^ Perez EE, Wang
J, Miller JC, et al. (July 2008).
"Establishment of HIV-1 resistance in CD4+ T cells by genome editing
using zinc-finger nucleases". Nat.
Biotechnol. 26 (7):
808–16. doi:10.1038/nbt1410. PMID 18587387.
- ^ Urnov FD,
Rebar EJ, Holmes MC, Zhang HS, Gregory PD (September 2010). "Genome
editing with engineered zinc finger nucleases". Nat. Rev. Genet. 11 (9): 636–46. doi:10.1038/nrg2842. PMID 20717154.
- Edelstein ML,
Abedi MR, Wixon J, Edelstein RM. Gene therapy clinical trials worldwide
1989-2004-an overview. J Gene Med 2004; 6: 597-602
- Lee JS, Thorgeirsson SS.
Genome-scale profiling of gene expression in hepatocellular carcinoma:
classification, survival prediction, and identifi cation of therapeutic
targets. Gastroenterology 2004; 127: S51-S55.
BITS Pilani
Tags:
Pharmacology