How Collaboration Between Clinicians and Pharmacists can ensure the Quality of Medicines in Nepal?

 The quality of medicines plays a crucial role in achieving optimal health outcomes, particularly in countries like Nepal, where regulatory oversight is still developing. Nepal currently stands at WHO Maturity Level 1 for regulatory systems, indicating limited regulatory capacity and enforcement mechanisms. This environment poses significant challenges for clinicians and pharmacists who must work collaboratively to ensure the availability of high-quality medicines, particularly branded generics, which dominate the pharmaceutical market in the region. This article explores actionable steps and critical considerations for such collaboration.

 


Understanding the Regulatory Landscape

In Nepal, weak regulatory frameworks result in inconsistent enforcement of Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP), limited post-market surveillance, and the circulation of substandard or falsified medicines. With limited capacity for routine inspections, product recalls, and independent quality testing, the burden of ensuring medicine quality often falls on healthcare professionals.

To address this, clinicians and pharmacists must actively participate in medicine/brand selection, monitoring, and feedback processes. They can leverage their positions to advocate for better practices by pharmaceutical companies and engage with regulators to strengthen systems.

Key Considerations for Ensuring Medicine Quality

1. Past Recall Record

  • Voluntary or Mandatory Recalls: Clinicians and pharmacists should prioritize medicines from companies with a clear history of addressing quality issues through voluntary recalls. Companies that proactively address quality problems demonstrate responsibility and commitment to safety.
  • Transparency of Recall Processes: Collaborators should assess whether companies have transparent recall mechanisms and communicate effectively with stakeholders about quality concerns.

2. Batch Records and Certificate of Analysis (CoA)

  • Documentation Review: Pharmacists can request for batch records and CoAs from manufacturers as part of their due diligence. These documents provide insights into the consistency of production processes and adherence to quality standards.
  • Spot Audits: Randomly verifying CoAs against independent testing results can ensure the data provided by companies is accurate. The pharmacist can seek help from the independent third party lab for ensuring the quality as per CoA.

3. Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) Compliance

  • Minimum Experience Threshold: Medicines should be sourced from companies with at least two years of consistent GMP compliance. New entrants may lack the operational stability needed to produce high-quality medicines consistently. One can ensure the drugs to be prescribed which has at least one complete lifecycle of a product which is around 2 years.
  • Inspection Reports: GMP compliance should be verified through publicly available inspection reports or direct communication with regulatory bodies. Normally Department of Drug administration releases such reports annually.

4. Insights from QC Departments

  • Employee Feedback: Pharmacists should build relationships with Quality Control (QC) employees of pharmaceutical companies to gain insights into production challenges, potential quality risks, and the company’s approach to addressing them.
  • Whistleblower Policies: Country should adopt whistleblower-friendly policies can facilitate transparency and proactive issue identification.

5. Comparative Evaluation with Innovator Products

  • Evidence of Bioequivalence: Whenever possible, pharmacists should request bioequivalence data or any comparative analysis that demonstrates therapeutic equivalence between branded generics and their innovator counterparts or if possible from Stringent regulatory authority countries.
  • Clinical Feedback: Clinicians should document patient responses to branded generics that he/she has been prescribing compared to innovator products and share findings with pharmacists for quality monitoring. Pharmacist can assist on this, especially on drugs used on chronic diseases.

6. Batch-to-Batch Variation Records

  • Consistency Monitoring: A history of batch-to-batch variations can indicate production instability. Pharmacists and clinicians should regularly communicate about observed variations in clinical effectiveness or adverse effects.
  • Trend Analysis: Maintaining records of batch variations over time can help identify patterns or recurring issues with specific brands.

7. Voluntary Recall Commitments

  • Proactive Responsibility: Companies should demonstrate a commitment to quality by implementing voluntary recall policies even in the absence of regulatory pressure.
  • Internal Quality Assurance Programs: Companies with robust internal quality assurance programs are more likely to identify and address quality issues early.

8. Third-Party Testing

  • Independent Lab Reports: Encouraging manufacturers to invest in independent third-party testing can provide an additional layer of assurance. Pharmacists should verify the credibility of testing laboratories and demand regular updates.

Additional Strategies for Clinician-Pharmacist Collaboration

1. Strengthening Procurement Policies

  • Jointly develop procurement guidelines for hospitals and pharmacies that emphasize quality over cost. Selection criteria should include GMP compliance, recall history, and independent quality testing. The team can blacklist those companies which don’t have good history of product with reference to product recall.

2. Building Trust with Manufacturers

  • Engage directly with pharmaceutical companies to understand their production processes and quality assurance measures. Transparent communication can lead to collaborative quality improvement efforts.

6. Involvement in Clinical Trials

  • Clinicians and pharmacists can advocate for local clinical studies like BA/BE studies of branded generics to evaluate their efficacy and safety in the Nepali population. Data generated from such trials can guide medicine selection.
  • 7. Preparing internal formulary

    •  Doctor and Pharmacist should collaborate to prepare a formulary based on their best knowledge and prescribe and maintain the same stock for dispensing. All the above information and knowledge should be used to make the formulary. In a bigger institution like hospitals Drug therapeutic committee can play a vital role to ensure the best quality medicine.

     


    Post a Comment

    Previous Post Next Post